Although POWO does list Lantana urticoides as "Lantana × urticoides", by doing so they are themselves overriding Roger Sanders, whose work is widely accepted as the current authority on the genus Lantana worldwide. Sanders speculates that L. urticoides likely originated by hybridization between L. hirsuta and L. kingii, but that it has long since been a full legitimate species of its own, no less legitimate than any other Lantana species (and it has historically always been widely accepted at species level). Hybridization is a tremendous driver of the speciation of life on Earth, but after time passes and the new species survives and stabilizes, reproducing itself reliably true-to-form in its environment over the longterm, it is no longer considered a hybrid but instead its own species.
Roger W. Sanders
Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas
Vol. 6, No. 2 (23 NOVEMBER 2012), pp. 403-441 (39 pages)
Published By: The Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Inc.
Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41972430 (Link)
It is a smart decision. I agree and happy with the change. We need this certainty about what we call stable entities, which are worth as individual species per se.
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
It is a smart decision. I agree and happy with the change. We need this certainty about what we call stable entities, which are worth as individual species per se.