', {"anonymize_ip":true});
Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by this split may have been replaced with identifications of Fomitopsis pinicola. This happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the output taxa. Review identifications of Fomitopsis pinicola 118052

Comments

@cooperj @aldendirks I have set this one up, again with the atlasing about as good as I can manage based on the limited data available to us. If there are more sources to use for this, please send them my way. Couldn't find anything on Asia, so I lumped them all into pinicola s.s. @alan_rockefeller if you have data that might be helpful in this, that would be appreciated, too. I know the sampling in California in that paper was relatively poor, especially with so many observations on iNat.
For the observations outside of the atlased zones, they should only be kicked up to the Fomitopsis pinicola complex (which I made recently), so not all the way to genus. That should still be pretty manageable.

Posted by jameskm over 1 year ago (Flag)

seems good to me

Posted by cooperj over 1 year ago (Flag)

So does Fomitopsis pinicola not exist anymore anywhere?

Posted by jasonrgrant over 1 year ago (Flag)

No, in Europe. The swap will take a while to go through, but all Eurasian observations will be moved to the new Fomitopsis pinicola.

Posted by jameskm over 1 year ago (Flag)

Add a Comment

Sign In or Sign Up to add comments

Gracias al apoyo de:

¿Quiere apoyarnos? Pregúntenos cómo escribiendo a snib.guatemala@gmail.com