Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by this split may have been replaced with identifications of Chionactis. This happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the output taxa. Review identifications of Chionactis occipitalis 27289
Update your content

Taxonomic Split 84958 (Committed on 2020-11-11)

See https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/445206
Both Reptile Database (RD) and SSAR carve off
Chionactis occipitalis annulata & Chionactis occipitalis klauberi as Chionactis annulata annulata & Chionactis annulata klauberi
RD also lumps Chionactis into Sonora (e.g. Sonora occipitalis & Sonora annulatus) but I'm not doing that yet since SSAR hasn't done that yet

unknown
Added by loarie on November 12, 2020 12:05 AM | Committed by loarie on November 11, 2020
split into

Comments

Did this apply correctly? It's keeping a lot of "Mojave" shovelnose outside of the range.

Posted by silversea_starsong over 3 years ago

I haven't committed it yet (but was about to)

Posted by loarie over 3 years ago

committed now - but will take a while to process

Posted by loarie over 3 years ago

I just realized this was a series of taxon changes, not just one, and this one is still draft.

Posted by silversea_starsong over 3 years ago

you can read more here https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/445206 I held off on spliting Chilomeniscus stramineus into straminea, fasciata & cincta and lumping Chionactis and Chilomeniscus into Sonora (as RD does) since SSAR doesn't - but both RD and SSAR are going with this occipitalis/annulata split so it seems uncontroverslai

Posted by loarie over 3 years ago

Add a Comment

Sign In or Sign Up to add comments

Gracias al apoyo de:

¿Quiere apoyarnos? Pregúntenos cómo escribiendo a snib.guatemala@gmail.com







Member of the iNaturalist Network   |   Powered by iNaturalist open source software |   Documentation for developers