Heads up: When you commit this change, identifications will
be re-assigned to the output taxa based on their atlases. If some or all of
the outputs lack atlases, or if atlases overlap for a given record,
identifications will be replaced with identifications of the nearest common
ancestor taxon (
Carex)
Carex)
Taxonomic Split 124864
(Draft)
|
|
split into |
|
POWO does not accept Carex virgata Miq. or Carex virgata Sol. ex Boott, synonymizing them with Carex rafflesiana Boott and Carex appressa R.Br., respectively. Do people wish to maintain Carex virgata, and can anyone provide supporting resources for maintaining it as distinct? The current sense most users seem to be applying in New Zealand is Carex virgata Sol. ex Boott.
@mark_smale @lloyd_esler @meurkc @fordk